The student is given an opportunity to amend his/her proposal, and the improved proposal can then be directly submitted to the reviewer/s to be reviewed again (however the proposal is no longer required to be presented at a seminar again, unless there are changes, which affects the substance of the proposal). The reviewer/s may write important notes for changes and improvements in the box. If the result of a seminar indicates that the proposal is FEASIBLE or NOT FEASIBLE for a skripsi research, the reviewer will sign and check (√) either one of the boxes provided in the Consent Form. The appointed reviewer/s may automatically become the concerned student’s supervisor/s. The Head of Study Program will appoint 3-4 lecturers as the reviewer/s of the proposal, excluding the student’s academic advisor and 1 moderator. Therefore, the academic advisor should seriously check and/or make sure whether the format is correct or not in accordance with the standard format. The proposal will be returned to the student if it does not follow the standard format.
The approved proposal is then submitted / administered to the Office of Study Program for scheduling of a seminar.
When the academic advisor approves the dratf proposal, he/she will sign the approval form (Consultation Control Form). The academic advisor will discuss the result of his/her review with the student concerned in order to advise on necessary changes recommended to be made. In addition to the content, the draft proposal should include a table of contents and list references. The draft proposal should be covered with a front page.
A student will submit a draft proposal to his/her academic advisor to be reviewed. SUBMISSION OF THE SKRIPSI PROPOSAL The mechanism of the proposal submission is as follows.